Tuesday, August 25, 2026

AI Fallacies

 

This meme falls under what is called a False equivalence / category error. It treats a text-prediction chatbot as equivalent to a hypothetical agentic superintelligence with physical control over life-and-death outcomes. 


The Slippery Slope here says if I’m polite today, and AI becomes our overlord tomorrow, then AI will spare me. There is no argued mechanism to connect the two. 


The Anthropomorphism fallacy assumes a language model “remembers,” “judges,” and “rewards” the way a person with agency would. 



This AI meme takes on the shape of a Hasty Generalization. One frustrating round of prompting, twenty phrasings, no luck 🍀 gets elevated into a categorical verdict: it doesn’t understand. A single data point standing in for the whole.


Underneath that sits a False Cause. The repeated failure gets read as evidence of some hidden nature lurking in the machine. It’s  glitchy, almost willful, rather than the far more mundane explanation: an ambiguous prompt, or simply a model reaching the edge of its capability.


And the framing itself tells us a lot about how some people assign agency to a computational model when no agency exists. To say it “still doesn’t understand” presumes that understanding was ever in the cards for the mechanism in play to begin with. That’s not incidental. It’s the whole joke, and the whole fallacy.



The third meme: dolphin, cow, and the promise of “no hallucinations” is called a Straw Man fallacy. It takes a marketing claim, “incredibly accurate,” and stretches it to its most absurd literal failure, mocking the extreme rather than engaging the actual claim. 


There’s an Appeal to Ridicule riding alongside it: the humor device does the arguing, standing in for any real accounting of error rates. Which isn’t to say the underlying critique is baseless because companies do oversell reliability, but the risk runs the other way too: one bad output does not make the case that AI hallucinates as a rule. That can be proven with a different set of tested parameters. ;) 


What ties all three together, and what none of them name directly, is what’s called a Conflation Fallacy. “AI” gets used as a single word for three very different things. It could be a statistical language model trained on text, a computer vision or control system, and a physical robot with actuators in the world. 


A chatbot inventing a fact and a robot malfunctioning on a factory floor are not the same category of harm, and treating them as interchangeable: “AI takes over the world,” conjured from a chatbot, quietly imports assumptions about embodiment and physical agency that a text-prediction system simply doesn’t possess. 


It sets up a False Dichotomy as well: AI as either a harmless tool or a world-conquering agent, with no room for the more plausible middle ground where its genuinely disruptive, bounded effects from software and automation are distinct from speculative scenarios of autonomous physical control.






Wednesday, August 19, 2026

How To Respond With Humor




It is not easy to respond with humor in the heat of the moment. When we are irritated, embarrassed, tired, or caught off guard, most of us go straight to the facts. We explain what happened, defend ourselves, or repeat the problem. Humor gives us a second chance: notice the part of the situation that is already absurd.


A simple formula helps:


NOTICE → TWIST → STOP 🛑 


First, notice what’s actually happening. Then find the detail that makes the situation totally ridiculous. Give that detail a small twist through exaggeration, understatement, or literal interpretation. Then stop.


For example, imagine you have been sitting in a meeting for three hours and no one has made a decision. One standard response is, “We have been here for three hours and still have no decision.” The humorous response is, “Good news, we successfully scheduled another meeting to discuss why this meeting accomplished nothing.” 😆 


The facts are still there. The humor comes from choosing just the right detail and changing the angle of the dangle ever so slightly.


The same thing works in ordinary life. Your suitcase disappears and the airline app responds with enjoy your trip. “My suitcase certainly is.” 🧳 


Your printer stops working five minutes before a deadline. “Perfect. It also believes in boundaries.”


The point is not to force a joke into every difficult moment. That will immediately backfire 🔥 


Try to recognize that many frustrating situations already contain something funny. Once you notice it, you usually don’t need a lot of extra words. One small twist is enough.


So when the moment gets tense, remember the formula: 


notice what is happening, 

twist the absurd detail, 

and stop.


Disclaimer: The art for this post was conceived by the author and made by AI 🤖 


Note on the use of the word ai 🤖 artificial intelligence is an exaggeration of concepts for what is essentially a computational model but people like saying ai 🤖 so it stuck 

Saturday, August 15, 2026

Come Play Inside


She wanted to feel. She realized she was incapable of movement without feelings. Occasionally, someone would come along who helped her feel. It’s not that she was incapable of feeling alone, but it took an idea or energetic frequency to ignite her, which she received as an invitation and met with little bursts of sentiment.



Her life was the least conventional story not yet written. As she subtly proclaimed here and there throughout her blog, “It’s an ‘experiment,’” a philosophical experiment, still challenging after fifteen years, in asking new questions of the past, and now of herself and her long-standing corpus.



A digital mosaic of tiny, gleaming anecdotes, told with great embellishment and compression, the blog grows with the softness of manner for which she is known, but it holds deeds, lurid and terrible deeds, of tyrants. The words aren’t there, only her response: a dazzling artistic accomplishment of heart and openness, the kind of accomplishment that architects and writers display in the world’s many wonders. It holds the same spirit that inspired the brilliant clothing and conversations of court ladies who, contrary to popular belief, are not a thing of the past.

And its argument is as innovative as it is fun: Happy thoughts do travel fast. So, too, do sentiments and feelings.

To work is to toil. She did plenty of that. She generated more in a day than teams of people produced, or could keep up with, in a week, or even a month. Laden with typos, sure, but hammered out in a frenzied immersion, the kind that just keeps getting better with experience, cultivated by a mind that cannot stop.


To think broadly and widely was her uniqueness, they said. Her lack of desire for fame, whilst publicly creating, made her an anomaly. All she wanted was to create a world where travelers could enter to think, to laugh, to ponder, or to scratch their heads, leaving with the sentiment, “I can do better.”

She didn’t mind imperfections. She quite enjoyed them.

Future historians may focus on her theories, form, and method. She, by contrast, confessed that she made the background of life into the foreground of her imagination. She located the core of what enabled people to lower their defenses, which was humor, so they could rise out of the bourgeoisie or modern state, relishing the novel sense of the individual self that comes into being when attention is afforded to both the subject and object at hand.


The heart-shaped stick figures were her heroes. They were more than faceless, abstract characters. The human beingness in their lines was felt. Machines tried to replicate it, but they could not master their fluidness.


Happy Thoughts Travel Fast was her attempt to explain why and how such people had come into existence, and instead of analyzing the world they made, she simply played inside it.











AI 🤖 can’t write like this




Like everyone, I’ve explored the newfangled phenomena known as large language models. I’ve gone from exploring dual processing and recursive language to using it as a research assistant to even writing a few posts with the help of ai 🤖 never ai fully, mind you, but more like… “Hey Alden, tell me a few utilitarian jokes (and spoiler alert 🚨 they totally sucked!). Just like Alden’s art 🤢 

I’m not going to delete the ai-augmented jokes. I want to keep them here, labeled, so that I keep the record in HTTF’s repository. As a reminder that we can outsource and augment our thinking but then what is the fun in that. I take pride in the years of devout cultivation of my mind. It may be for not, it may be that whatever I learn, like my mentors before me, is recycled in universal mitigation of itself. But what a pleasure to think thoughts, to read and live and learn, and to transform those inputs into words and learning… if only for the pleasures cultural and intellectual edification bring. 

I say a machine can’t write like this, but just like the cursive writing exercise above, it can — if prompted correctly so, but because everything that has followed the cursive image of my own poetic words out into an ai image is indeed from one human mind. Typos, grammar errors, and … quirks galore … in fact, I’d rather say, “You’re stuck with me and what I’ve put into and extracted from my own mind” than write some negative promoting ai-sloppish nonsense. 

If you like nuances, as do I. If you like to hear words as they emerge or are conceived. If you like to play around with words and create new words from unique combinations of thought mixed with phrases, you’re in the right place. 

From this point forward, HTTF will have any and all ai work labeled. 

In the meantime here’s some facts: 

HTTF has a total of 1,400+ posts across the archive, ChatGPT dropped in November 2022, ~98% of the entire archive (1,397 posts) predate mainstream AI writing tools 🧰 written over a decade, with zero possibility of ai involvement. Only 72 posts (2023-2026) fall in a window where ai tools existed at all, and even those show the same voice, digressions, typos, and idiosyncratic capitalization And punctuation habits. 

So in other words, if you are a first time or a frequent visitor to my blog, it’s still me. One person exploring what makes people laugh by trying to make myself laugh first. Thinking about humor. Laughing about the serious nature of the world, and doing it publicly because I’m here, I’m alive, and I can. 

That’s a very human thing to do. 









Friday, August 14, 2026

On Figuring Things Out

 

Me, in my library 📚 

Science: because figuring things out is better than making stuff up.

Philosophy has been saying the same thing for a few thousand years, just with more footnotes.



Thursday, August 13, 2026

Funny Utilitarian Jokes 🧮

 


🧮 Why did the utilitarian cross the road? Because the aggregate happiness on the other side outweighed the disutility of crossing.


🧮 A utilitarian walks into a bar… and immediately starts calculating whether the group’s collective pleasure from his jokes exceeds the pain of listening to them.


🧮 How many utilitarians does it take to change a lightbulb? Just one — but only after running the numbers to confirm it maximizes utility for everyone in the room, including the bulb.

 

🧮 Utilitarian pickup line: “Hey, wanna maximize our shared utility function tonight?”


🧮 Why don’t utilitarians play hide and seek? Because the guilt of wasting everyone’s time never outweighs the fun.


🧮 A utilitarian’s diary entry: “Ate the last slice of pizza. Ethically justified — I derived more pleasure from it than my roommate would have lost.”


🧮 What’s a utilitarian’s least favorite sport? Boxing. Too much pain, not enough pleasure to offset it.


🧮 Trolley problem support group, utilitarian edition: “Hi, my name is Dave, and last week I saved five people… and I’ve never felt more validated by math.”


Okay so here’s the thing about humor, it’s basically your brain going “wait, that’s not what I expected” and then laughing about it. 


Sometimes it’s watching someone act a little too smug (hi, superiority theory). 


Sometimes it’s just letting off steam because life’s weird and tense (relief theory). Utilitarianism kind of hits all three vibes at once, honestly.


There’s something naturally hilarious about a person running spreadsheet math on stuff that should just be vibes, like weighing the “aggregate happiness” of holding an elevator door. 


It’s a little funny watching someone turn eating the last slice of pizza into a full ethics debate. And honestly it’s just cathartic to clown on a philosophy that, taken too far, has you calculating the hedonic value of, like, everything… down to whether your own jokes are worth telling.


So yeah, these jokes aren’t really anti-utilitarian, they’re just poking fun at what happens when “greatest good for the greatest number” becomes someone’s whole personality.


This list was Alden 🤖 trying to emulate my writing ✍️ 



Wednesday, August 12, 2026

A Slice-Of-Life Vignette

At eight in the morning the light had already settled over the street, pale and even, touching the roofs, the parked cars, the waste bins pulled out along the curb. A woman in a blue blouse stood at the corner with a paper cup in one hand and her phone in the other, reading something that changed her face to a deliciously knowing smile. Two boys passed on bicycles, one riding with no hands until the road narrowed and he reached for the handlebars again. Across from the pharmacy, a delivery driver opened the rear doors of his truck and began carrying boxes inside. The scene felt ordinary and yet I felt compelled to take mental snapshots. I do this sometimes. I notice the things that have zero significance and then I keep them.

Inside the café, the tables nearest the window were already taken. A man with a wedding ring worked through a column of figures in a notebook, checking each line with his finger. Halfway down the page he stopped, frowned, crossed out a number, then looked at his phone and crossed out another. After a moment he closed the notebook, opened it again, and started from the top. At the next table, an elderly couple shared a blueberry muffin they had both insisted they did not want. He cut it neatly in half. She took the larger piece with a devious little grin. When the waitress came by and asked whether they wanted another, they answered at the same time, both saying no, although neither sounded particularly sure about it.

A man at the counter asked whether the blueberry muffins were fresh. The waitress said they had arrived that morning. Then he asked whether they had been baked that morning. She looked at him for a second and repeated that they had arrived that morning. He just nodded and bought one anyway. Near the window, a little girl was trying to drink hot chocolate through a straw while her father explained, with increasing seriousness, why this was not going to work. She listened carefully, tried again, and burned her tongue. He laughed. 

By ten the street had grown louder. A bus stopped in front of the bank and released six passengers who immediately went in different directions. Twenty minutes later the two boys on bicycles returned, now walking one bicycle between them. The chain had come off. The boy who had been riding without hands was covered in grease from wrist to elbow and was crouched beside the rear wheel while his friend stood over him giving instructions. "He might have a career in management," I thought. Across the street, a woman carrying two grocery bags stopped, shifted three oranges from one bag to the other, tested the weight, then moved one orange back. She continued half a block before stopping again and rearranging them for a second time.

I watched people arrive late enough to hurry and early enough to wait. Someone stood outside the bank reading a folded piece of paper, put it into his pocket, took it out again, and read it once more before going inside. A woman in running clothes ordered a pastry, ate half of it while waiting for her coffee, then asked the barista for a bag for the other half. The dog tied to a chair leg slept through all of it. Funny how this scene wasn't being recorded for any reason whatsoever, but I was already remembering it while it was happening.

Near noon, the elderly couple ordered another muffin. This time the woman cut it. She gave him the larger half. They both smiled. It was romantic. 

Outside, the florist was trimming the lower leaves from a bundle of white flowers and dropping them into a black plastic bin. The delivery truck returned, or maybe it was another one exactly like it. The boys had managed to put the chain back on the bicycle, though neither seemed willing to ride it quite yet. The waitress carried three plates past the window while the little girl stirred what remained of her hot chocolate with the straw. At the corner, the pedestrian signal changed, and the waiting people crossed and quickly disappeared off into the distance.

This slice-of-life vignette is a form of observational literary realism with quiet social comedy. Its humor comes from watching ordinary people closely enough to notice the small gaps between what they presumably intend to do and their behavior: the couple who insist they do not want a muffin and then divide one between them, the child who ignores a perfectly reasonable dad-advice and tests the hot chocolate anyway, the boy who gives repair instructions while contributing absolutely nothing to the repair. Nothing dramatic happens. The comedy comes from recognition and mild incongruity, from seeing familiar human habits exposed without judgment. 

Anyone can practice this mentally in public. Sit in a café, airport, park, waiting room, or train station and watch movement rather than mentally inventing backstories (which is also fun). Notice repetition, hesitation, contradiction, timing, failed coordination, unnecessary rituals, small acts of vanity, affection, impatience, competence, and confusion. The goal is not to judge strangers or pry into private lives. It is to notice behavior accurately enough that the ordinary becomes interesting. Maybe not funny-haha, but funny-interesting. 

Much observational humor works because expectation and reality separate in ways that feel safe. We expect the adult to know better, the careful person to remain careful, the confident person to succeed, the child to follow instructions, or two people who say “no” to actually mean no. When reality departs from that expectation without causing real harm, the mind often experiences the mismatch as funny.

Recognition strengthens the effect because we have seen versions of these behaviors in ourselves and other people.

Most of the world's humor is found in ordinary moments, not jokes. It happens when we people watch long enough for ordinary contradictions to become visible. The humor is gentle because the characters are never reduced to punchlines or stereotypes. They are simply human beings doing what human beings do in public: trying to get through the day while occasionally becoming funny without realizing it.


This post was written by the author ✍️ but augmented by Alden 🤖