What are things?
Things are divided into different categories: everythings,
somethings, and nothings. This three-part division of things is based on the
spaces in which things reside; a thing is defined in terms of its spatial
boundaries.
What is space?
Space, as it is described herein, is not limited to a single
physical (three-dimensional) space: it may be multidimensional (an arbitrary number
of dimensions) or even a conceptual space. The dimensionality of the space is
assumed to be equivalent to the objects in it: for example, four-dimensional
space is necessary to contain four-dimensional things.
Three things
When we speak of the subjective and objective experience of
the physical universe, we can further divide subjective into perceptual and
conceptual parts. In this respect, three things are created, which we may call
universes. The resulting parts are made up of references: the conceptual
universe refers to the subjective universe, which in turn refers to the
physical universe.
What are references?
References form the basis of universes: the division between
one universe and another similarly divides the referrers from the referents.
The subjective universe contains references to the objective universe. From our subjective point of view, references
are responsible for perception. From the objective point of view, references
are physical things. This dual characteristic of references is what makes them
exceptional, and what makes the boundaries between universes composed of
references so peculiar.
Numbering things
In our universe, there exists one everything, many
somethings, and exactly zero nothings.
Everything
Everything refers
to every thing, combined together.
Although everything is often times conceptualized as a single unit, it is
easier to regard it as something that is neither singular nor plural (the
concept of singularity requires the concept of plurality).
It is difficult to imagine everything as there is nothing from which to distinguish it. We can draw a circle around it to help visualize it, but this is a
misnomer as everything, by nature of its definition, would be unbounded: no
boundary could be present if everything was accounted for.
Hence the expression, “It is difficult to think of
everything.”
The Whole Enchilada
Everything, otherwise known as “the whole enchilada,” cannot
be defined. It is impossible to say what it is, and impossible to say what it
is not. Everything was initially whole and without parts and without the lack
of parts.
Ingredients
The ingredients of everything occupy every position in all
dimensions which are attributed to it.
It is difficult to define everything since there is nothing
to which it can be compared (other than itself). Definitions are always given
in terms of other things, so it is impossible to define a thing for which there
is no other thing.
Pondering the Universe (2014)
Shenn
A short story
Once upon a time, there was a girl named Erica.
Erica was considered by her parents and relatives to be a
precocious child. Having read most of the books in her local library by the
time she was twelve years old, she found herself disenchanted with life.
“Human beings often times prefer adversity, without which
they would have nothing to examine. This is the reason for mental anguish.”
Wondering what life would be like without mental anguish,
without the constant, infernal internal dialogue constantly hammering at her brain and wreaking havoc on her insides, Erica thought about the nature of
everything (as described above) and an epiphany presented itself to her conscious mind:
“What if I forgo my subjective perception of the component
parts of everything and instead focus on everything?”
But how does one focus on everything without ignoring other
things? (such as buttering one’s toast in the morning or pouring oneself a cup
of orange juice)
Erica started to realize how difficult it was to think of
everything. So, she sat on her favorite rock, trying diligently not to think about the rock, but rather to think of
the rock as part of everything. Then she tried not to think of parts, but
rather things as the summation of parts. Then she tried not to think of
summations, as conceptually they could be considered things, which are
constituent parts of everything.
In order to think of everything, Erica thought to herself that she
would have to focus on nothing. But thinking of nothing is difficult for every
time you think you’re thinking of nothing, something pops into your head.
Erica began to wonder if it was possible to think of
everything or to think of nothing and concluded, after taking some aspirin for
her headache, that it was impossible for the human mind to conceive of
everything or of nothing.
And, thus, the nature of human existence is mental anguish.
Without mental anguish, human beings could not think. If human beings could not
think, they would cease to exist.
Erica was not entirely excited by the notion that she was held hostage in a
physical vehicle, a constituent part of the physical universe incapable of
thinking of everything or of nothing, but what could she do?
There was no way to turn off her brain, at least, no way that she knew of. Even dreaming wasn’t turning off her brain for she often times dreamed of strange or bizarre Echer-like versions of her life and thoughts. Never in her sleep did she dream of everything or of nothing. She might forget her dreams, but forgetting and nothing are not the same thing. Of course, she could not verify this thought because she could not think of nothing and therefore had nothing against which she could differentiate the experience.
There was no way to turn off her brain, at least, no way that she knew of. Even dreaming wasn’t turning off her brain for she often times dreamed of strange or bizarre Echer-like versions of her life and thoughts. Never in her sleep did she dream of everything or of nothing. She might forget her dreams, but forgetting and nothing are not the same thing. Of course, she could not verify this thought because she could not think of nothing and therefore had nothing against which she could differentiate the experience.
Erica decided that for as long as she was held in human form,
that she would do her very best to slow down the thoughts that divided her mind
from the concept of everything and of nothing and as she grew older used this
thought experiment as a basis for relaxation.
“At first there was
nothing and then it blew up.”
At first there was everything and then a whole lot of
somethings and no nothings. And while there may have been and while there still
may be everything, no human being can conceive of it. And while there may be a
nothing, no human being can conceive of that, either.
So, human beings can only think of parts, of somethings.
That is what human minds do. They are the processors of somethings. Human
beings exist in a world of somethings. Human beings are bound by somethings.
Human beings are somethings.
With that, Erica decided to think about something else.
The End
No comments:
Post a Comment